On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 06:10:08PM +1100, Tim Clewlow wrote:
>
> I once worked for a company that was asked to reverse engineer a
> file as the client had lost the original source. The method was to
> first create lots of simple programs that each contained just one,
> or few, lines of code, compile it, and then slowly build up a
> one-to-one map of source to binary. It was _____extremely_____
> tedious the compiler would optimise code and so trial and error
> guesses had to often be made to try and get the compiler to build a
> specific chunk of binary. I do not want to ever do that again.
> However, it can be done.
>
> Please note, as others have said, you will not get any object names
> (variables or procedures) out of this, and you will always have to
> make educated guesses when data chunks are hard coded in.
>
> Regards, Tim.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5ebd1c701d43edd6bb09531a2cea4dac.squirrel@192.168.1.100
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isomorphism
.png)
| jeffrin@rocketmail.com |